Friday, December 15, 2017

OCMA Blog

"No on 46" Campaign Victorious

 

We did it!  A coalition of nearly 1,000 organizations, led by CMA and OCMA, successfully - and resoundingly - defeated Proposition 46.  Here are the results that were posted early this morning:

                                • No: 67.1% / 3,415,996 votes
                                • Yes: 32.9% / 1,671,163 votes

This unworkable proposition would have dramatically altered MICRA by making it easier to file lawsuits against health care providers, increasing health care costs, reducing access to care and ultimately generating more legal fees for lawyers.

Despite the proponents' attempt to confuse voters about Proposition 46, the public decisively voiced its desire to preserve MICRA and all of its protections. This win is proof that Californians agree on the importance of access to quality health care across the state and they won't be fooled by political sweeteners.

OCMA and CMA will continue to stay vigilant in our work with the legislature to ensure that your elected representatives remember what the people said on Election Day 2014. We will continue to work to ensure that MICRA is protected. 
 
Thank you for your hard work, ongoing efforts and financial contributions to defeat Proposition 46!  We couldn't have done it without you.


Prop 46 Update for Physicians: Proposition 46 isn’t the CURE(S)

Today in California, trial lawyers are waging an aggressive campaign to overturn California's landmark Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA).
 
On November 4, voters will be asked to weigh in on Proposition 46, a costly and deceptive measure funded and sponsored almost exclusively by trial lawyers. In addition to raising health care costs and reducing access to quality medical care, Prop. 46 could put patient prescription drug history at risk of being hacked and would force physicians and pharmacists to use an unworkable database.
 
The Controlled Utilization Review and Evaluation System, or CURES, is a statewide, government-run database that allows physicians to know which medications patients are taking. In concept, it could be a helpful tool in ensuring that patients don't "doctor shop" - or visit several doctors to get multiple prescriptions for controlled substances.
 
Though the database already exists, it is underfunded, understaffed and technologically incapable of handling the massively increased demands this ballot measure will place on it. In its current form, the CURES database is plagued with system errors and major deficiencies. The state staffer in charge of CURES recently testified that the database is "not sufficient enough to carry out the mission that we need." To see excerpts of his testimony, click here
 
In fact, in evaluating Prop. 46 the independent, non partisan Legislative Analyst noted, "Currently CURES does not have sufficient capacity to handle the higher level of use that is expected to occur when providers are required to register beginning in 2016."
 
Despite all of this, Prop. 46 includes a provision that would mandate physicians and pharmacists check the CURES database before prescribing Schedule II or III drugs - a list of medications that is far too long for this newsletter. This "CURES mandate flaw" puts physicians in the untenable position of either breaking their professional oath to give patients the best possible care or breaking the law.
 
What's more, the CURES mandate comes without any increased security to ensure that the database is up and running efficiently, effectively and safely before legally making health care professionals check it.

That's a risky gamble in these days of massive data breaches.   

In the few weeks left between now and Election Day, I cannot stress enough how important it is to spread the word about the dangers of Prop. 46.    As you've read in previous issues of this publication, Prop. 46 is really three measures carelessly thrown together by trial attorneys with the hopes that adding "sweetener" provisions - including the CURES piece discussed above  - will trick voters. The real intention is to increase the cap on medical malpractice payouts, which will increase health care costs for everyone and decrease access for those who need it most. Prop. 46 will result in money being pulled directly out of the health care delivery system and put into the pockets of trial attorneys at the expense of voters everywhere.  


How can you get engaged in the final stages of the No on Prop. 46 campaign?


- "Like" the No on 46 Facebook page

- Follow the No on 46 Twitter page

- Visit the offical campaign website at www.noon46.com


FREE Campaign Materials

OCMA has campaign materials at our offices available for physicians to pick up, including yard signs, campaign buttons, patient brochures, office posters and bumper stickers.

You can also order these materials to be sent straight to your office (yard signs only available for pick-up at OCMA). Just fill out the No on 46 order form.


No on 46 "Take Action" Contest

Take action in the No On 46 fight now through October 19, 2014 and your practice could win $500! 

Click here for information on the contest.


More information

Visit these websites in order to learn more about MICRA and Prop 46 so that you can educate your colleagues, friends, peers and family:

- The CMA website

- No on 46 campaign website

- Californians Allied for Patient Protection (CAPP) Website

 


No On 46 Campaign Launches First Statewide TV & Radio Media Buy Highlighting the High Cost of Prop 46

Ads tell the real story behind this year’s most fiscally-reckless measure

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

SACRAMENTO – The No on 46 campaign announced today that it has launched its first statewide television and radio ad buys in both English and Spanish.

The ads, “Risk” (TV :30) and “Real Story” (Radio :60), focus on the first – and most obvious – of the myriad of reasons for California voters to reject Proposition 46: the fact it is written and nearly exclusively funded by trial attorneys for their financial benefit while everyone else in California – health consumers, taxpayers, and state and local governments – will pay more.

View the ad here: http://www.noon46.com/the-real-story-video/.

Because Proposition 46 is really three different initiatives in one – all of which are too complicated, too costly and too flawed – an unprecedented coalition of more than 600 statewide and community groups have joined to oppose it, including (partial list):

  • California Teachers Association
  • California School Boards Association
  • Association of California School Administrators
  • California State Firefighters Association
  • League of California Cities
  • Urban Counties Caucus
  • Rural County Representatives of California
  • California Special Districts Association
  • California Chamber of Commerce
  • Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California
  • AFSCME California PEOPLE
  • State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
  • California Medical Association
  • California Dental Association
  • California Hospital Association
  • California Pharmacists Association
  • American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
  • American College of Emergency Physicians, California Chapter
  • California Association of Physician Groups
  • California Association for Nurse Practitioners
  • Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
  • Community Clinics Association of Los Angeles County
  • La Clínica de La Raza
  • California Association of Rural Health Clinics
  • Central Valley Health Network
  • NAACP California
  • California Republican Party
  • Los Angeles County Democratic Party
  • Yuba County Democratic Party

To learn more, visit www.NoOn46.com


MICRA Alert and Prop 46 Resources for Physicians

In less than 100 days, voters will be asked to weigh in on the MICRA health care lawsuit measure known as Prop. 46, which will hugely jeopardize the privacy of patients' personal prescription medical information.
 
The initiative will force doctors and pharmacists to use a massive statewide database known as the Controlled Substance Utilization Review Evaluation System (CURES), which is filled with patients' personal prescription drug information. Though the database already exists, it is underfunded, understaffed and technologically incapable of handling the massively increased demands that this ballot measure will place on it.
 

Most concerning, the massive ramp up of this database will significantly put patients' private medical information at risk and the ballot measure doesn't contain any provisions or funding to help upgrade the system or increase the database's security standards. As many of you know, the CURES database contains highly sensitive patient information including personal and potentially stigmatizing details about their health. Prescription information including medication used to treat obesity, narcolepsy, conditions related to cancer and AIDS, asthma and other sensitive information are all contained within the CURES database. 

In recent weeks and months, the coalition to oppose the MICRA health care lawsuit initiative continues to grow. Teachers, health care workers, local community groups and hundreds of others have pledged to vote NO in November because they too understand the implications this measure would have on patients, taxpayers and consumers across the state.

We know that if this measure passes, it won't just be putting patients' personal medical information at risk, but malpractice lawsuits and payouts will also skyrocket, adding "hundreds of millions of dollars" in new costs to state and local governments, according to an impartial analysis conducted by the state's Legislative Analyst. State and local governments face higher costs in two ways: 
 
  • They provide health care for current and retired employees;
  • They provide health care for low-income residents through Medi-Cal and other locally run health care programs like community clinics and hospitals.

Someone will have to pay for these increased costs, and that someone is you (physicians), taxpayers and consumers/patients.
 
The campaign opposed to the initiative - "Patients and Providers to Protect Access and Contain Health Costs" - is a diverse and growing coalition of trusted doctors, community health clinics, hospitals, family-planning organizations, local leaders, public safety officials, businesses, and working men and women formed to oppose this costly, dangerous ballot proposition that would make it easier and more profitable for lawyers to sue doctors and hospitals. A full and updated list of groups opposing the campaign can be found here.
 
United as one voice, advocating for patients across the state, we can defeat this ballot measure in November, but we need everyone to commit and become engaged along the way. Thank you in advance for all that you do and all that you'll continue to do. 

Join the Fight

CMA and the campaign to defeat Prop. 46 need each and every one of you to help spread the word and educate your colleagues about the critical importance of MICRA. To that end, CMA has developed a MICRA Commitment Card.

We ask that you fill out one of these cards and pledge that you will vote no on the anti-MICRA measure known as Prop. 46.

Campaign Materials

The CMA can provide your office with campaign materials such as patient brochures, posters, buttons, campaign stickers and more. Just fill out the No on 46 order form.

More information

Visit these websites in order to learn more about MICRA so that you can educate your colleagues, friends, peers and family:

- The CMA website

- No on 46 campaign website

- Californians Allied for Patient Protection (CAPP) Website

What else can you do to support MICRA?

- "Like" the No on 46 Facebook page

- Follow the No on 46 Twitter page

- Visit the offical campaign website at www.noon46.com


MICRA lawsuit measure assigned proposition number

Via the California Medical Association-

The unprecedentedly broad and diverse coalition working to defeat the trial lawyers’ MICRA lawsuit measure is now officially the “No On 46” campaign, following the assignment of proposition numbers to qualified ballot measures by the Secretary of State’s Office on Monday.

If approved by voters, Proposition 46 would increase health costs, reduce access to care and threaten patient privacy, all to make it easier and more profitable for lawyers to sue doctors and hospitals. In addition to increasing the overall number of medical lawsuits and the cost of health care across the board, Proposition 46 contains a number of unrelated provisions designed to mislead and deceive voters – including a little-discussed mandate relying on a massive expansion of a government-run prescription drug database, which third-party analysts say cannot be implemented as written and will leave personal medical information vulnerable to privacy breach.

For these reasons, health providers, education groups, labor unions, business organizations, working men and women, and community clinics have all announced their opposition to Proposition 46.

On Monday, two additional groups – the State Building and Construction Trades Council of California (SBCTC) and the California NAACP – joined the “No On 46” campaign, pointing out the devastating effects it would have on California.

“This initiative will cost state and local governments hundreds of millions dollars and raise health costs for everyone,” said Robbie Hunter, President of the SBCTC. “That hurts job creation and will negatively impact California’s future.”

According to California’s independent Legislative Analyst, the proposed measure could increase state and local government health costs by “hundreds of millions of dollars annually.”

“This measure is terribly flawed and will reduce access to quality health care for underserved communities,” said Alice Huffman, President of the California NAACP. “At a time when we’re working hard to cover as many Californians as possible under the ACA, Proposition 46 takes us in the wrong direction. Proposition 46 will disproportionately hurt minority communities. It’s bad medicine for California.”

These two organizations join the growing list of California public entities and private organizations that have announced their formal opposition. For a complete list, please visit the campaign website, www.noon46.com.


Home   |   About Us   |   Membership   |   For Physicians   |   News   |   For Patients   |   Advocacy   |   Events
Copyright (c) 2017 Orange County Medical Association